And now there is Voro++ on Nuget. Voro++ is a library and utility, written by Chris Rycroft (with Applied Mathematics in Harvard SEAS) for compute Voronoi cells für 3D data. I use his lib actually to compute natural neighbors in my particle data sets. For me, Voro++ is better suited than other libs, like e.g. qhull, for several reasons: it is easy to use, streamlined for 3D, and natively support periodic boundary conditions. The single drawback I found, there are no official binary releases for Windows. And that is why I started this nuget package.
The library’s source code is rather clean and compiles without problem in Visual Studio. So all I did, was compiling the static library for the four latest Visual C++ versions, and I put the nuget package together. My Visual Studio solution and project files are also publicly available on bitbucket: https://bitbucket.org/sgrottel_nuget/voro
The package contains the static library, the header files, some files from the documentation, and the command line tool built with MSVC 2015. If you only want the command line tool and don’t care for the lib, simply download the nuget package, unzip it (yes, nuget packages are basically zip files), and you’ll find the exe in the tools subdirectory. For the full documentation of the library, go the Chris’ website or the original source code package.
What I didn’t include in the nuget package are any samples. But compiling them for yourself is as simple as it could be:
1. start a new C++ console application in visual studio.
Be sure to deactivate precompiled headers and to make the project empty.
2. drag-drop-add any cc-example.
Just use any file from Chris’ source code package into the project.
3. Add the voroplusplus nuget package.
4. And you’re done! Compile it and run it by a push of a button.
We have projects working with WinForms GUIS. Different Developers work with different Computers, and these have different DPI settings. Every time the Project is opened on a system with different DPIs the WinForms get scaled, which is painfully bad.
Set in your Forms Designer: Font = MS Sans; 11px
In the Forms Ctor, after InitializeComponent, set: Font = SystemFonts.DefaultFont
Enable DPI-Awareness, either through a manifest or by API function SetProcessDPIAwareness
A modern Windows approach to High-DPI Displays
More and more Computers get equipped with High-DPI Displays, a trend I like very much. Pixels cannot be small enough. With modern Windows, however, GUI of older Applications get infamously blurry. This is due to Microsoft’s approach for backward-compatibility: applications will be rendered at their native DPI and scaled up to the system’s DPI. This way, the application does not need to know anything about DPI, but user controls will keep a decent size on any setting. While most people hate the blurriness of old GUIs on modern Windows, this approach does make a lot of sense:
Backward-Compatibility is instantly given, as nothing changes for the old Applications.
The users input experience is retained, as the GUI will keep its apparent size. (Just thing, if you’re old enough, of the original GUI of Winamp, where the buttons in the default skin were sometimes just a few Pixels in size.)
(last but not least) for new Applications, Developers hopefully get upset with the blurry look, that they actually invest some time, to do it right!
So, don’t claim it’s all Microsoft’s fault that the GUI of your applications look blurry. Truth is, you were just too lazy to do it right.
If you browse the internet in search for how to handle high-DPI settings with WinForms, you are bound to stumble upon a smart-ass telling you to switch to WPF. That person does have a point: WPF is designed to be a GUI for all resolutions. But, that person is also an idiot. Don’t bother discussing.
If you decided to use WinForms, then use WinForms. It is not deprecated, it is not legacy, it is not broken. There are good reasons to use WinForms. One, for example, would be the nice compatibility with Mono (Linux and MacOS). Another one would be compatibility with native GUI controls. Whatever your reason is, don’t let other people easily throw you off track.
If you’re not fixed on WinForms, but want to write a new Application for Windows, then have a look at WPF.
Why does Visual Studio Scale?
Normally Windows works at 96 DPI. That is, you need 96 pixels to fill up one inch of screen space. On a higher setting, let’s say 144 DPI, you need 144 pixels. So, either your GUI elements will look smaller, or your GUI elements must be larger to look the same. Modern graphical content is thus not described in pixels, but often in points (pt). Points are defined as 1/72 inch, that is in screen space, and not in pixels.
WinForms is not a modern GUI. All Elements are designed with pixels. However, higher DPI settings were present in Windows for a long time (accessibility feature). WinForms answers to this by having a mechanism to scale the whole GUI ‘manually’. If a scaling factor different from one is determined, all GUI elements, positions, sizes, etc., are multiplied by that factor, including the overall size of the window. By default, this scaling factor is determined comparing the Font settings of the form. Fonts are usually specified with a size in pt. Windows computes the font size in pixels based on the active DPI value. If WinForms now detects a mismatch between the pixel-based font sizes between design-time specifications and run-time evaluation, the form and all content is scaled. And this is exactly what happens in the Visual Studio Windows Forms designer.
Visual Studio does basically nothing at all. However, the font size evaluation is based on the system’s DPI setting. So on high-DPI systems, the font’s pixel size will be different from the stored design-time pixel size, and thus the whole form will be scaled accordingly. That is a good idea at run-time. I mean, that is the whole point of this mechanism. However, we are still at design time. The problem raises, because the Forms designer in Visual Studio actually runs the WinForms engine. As now all GUI elements change their sizes, the designer is informed (likely by the normal events) and adjusts all generated code to the new sizes and locations. This is, of course, ugly, painful and stupid, if you are going to continue the development on another machine with another, maybe, lower DPI setting.
Disable Scaling at Design-Time, Enable Scaling at Run-Time
What I am writing here is not a premium solution. It is the workaround I found for myself to work best.
The basic idea is to (manually) disable scaling at design time, and to (manually) enable scaling at run time.
I write scaling, but what we actually change is the Font!
Keep the Form’s AutoScaleMode = Font. That setting is correct and is not the problem at all. The problem is the automatically used font. It is the system’s default font, which specifies its size in pt. Again, a good idea at run time. What we change is the Font setting of the Form, to specify the size in pixels.
In the Designer, set the Font to: Microsoft Sans Serif; 11px
Windows default Font is Microsoft San Serif 8 pt. according to MSDN. Actually, it seems more like 8.25 pt. So this is 8.25/72 inch, which finally results in 8.25 * 96/72 = 11 pixel on a normal DPI system. That is why you set the font to this painfully small looking value. It is the right one! Now edit your GUI on all systems you have. Your Forms will not be scaled by Visual Studio any more. So, design time is fixed.
Now for the run time. That one is easy, too. All we need to do is to ‘reset’ the Form’s font to have its size specified in pt. again. The easiest way to do that is to reassign the system’s default font. Just set it in the constructor, right after InitializeComponent:
Font = SystemFonts.DefaultFont;
This, of course, only works if you are on a system where the system’s default font is as expected, and only if you do not change fonts for the controls inside your form. If you did change some control’s font, you specify the font with pixel size for design time and you update these at run time initialization to use pt.-based sizes again.
Scalable GUI Design
And that is that. If your application is already DPI aware, your forms will now scale nicely. That is, if you designed them correctly.
You should not mix docking-based and anchor-based design in the same form. That is bound to produce weird scaling issues.
You must use either, otherwise the controls will just randomly shift somewhere.
Be aware that the control might no longer fit into your Form, due to the maximum window size. Use flowing layout containers and auto scrollbars.
Enable DPI Awareness
All that, of course, only makes any sense if you enable DPI awareness for your application. There are basically two options:
Maybe, you know, that modern Windows can be even more complicated by per-monitor DPI settings. The idea is, that attached external screens have different sizes and resolutions, and should thus be handled with different DPIs. The good news is: this approach here works instantly with per-monitor DPI. When the form is dragged onto another monitor, the system automatically adjusts the font setting, as the font size is at run time specified in points. This automatically triggers a rescaling of the form. Wheee!
Most new data sets for my scientific visualization find their way to my desk in form of arbitrarily structures text files. This is not really a problem. The first sensible step is converting them into a fast binary format for the visual analysis. With this, however, I face the problem of understanding the structure of 11 Gigabytes text files (no exaggeration here!). But, such files do have structure. So, only the few first and few last lines really matter. The bits in-between will be roughly the same way. What I need are the Linux-known commands “head” and “tail”. However, I am a Windows guy. So? The Powershell comes to the rescue:
The Windows Powershell is quite nice. Of course, now all the Linux users start bitching around, that they always has something like this and that it is nothing special. And no one claims otherwise. But still, the PowerShell is nice and I enjoy it. 🙂
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.